skip to main | skip to sidebar
Home » » Consider Waiting for Godot as a play belonging to the Theatre of the Absurd or, absurd drama

Theatre of the absurd

The "Theatre of the absurd "is associated with the names of Samuel Beckett, Eugene lonesco, Jean Genet , and Arthur Adamov. But Beckett's contribution to this particular genre allows us to refer to him as the grand 
master or father of the genre. The absurd drama grew out of a sense of metaphysical anguish at the absurdity of the human condition in the universe.  The absurd dramatists take things rationally and not romantically. It is a drama without a traditional plot , story or division into acts and scenes. It has fewest possible characters. In this type of drama dialogues are very short and crisp. The playwright tries to communicate the meaninglessness of life through dialogues.
Theatre of the absurd -waiting for godot
Samuel Beckett

Absurd drama

The absurd dramatist are all concerned with the failure of communication in modern society which leaves man alienated . The characters in am absurd drama are unsubstantial.  They become significant for the symbols they represent. Things are not explained ;they are merely hinted at or suggested.  Waiting for Godot of Samuel Beckett is an absurd play.  This drama depicts an absolute negation of human existence. It lacks action and proper plot , and the characters are tied together by a fear of being left entirely alone.  We get the impression that man is totally lost in a disintegrating society. We find in this drama two tramps conversing in a repetition , strangely fragmented dialogue that bears an illusory, haunting effect,While they are Waiting for Godot, a vague, never defined being who will bring them some communication about -what? Salvation? Death? An impetus for living?  A reason for dying ? No one knows, and the safest thing to say in that the two are probably waiting for someone or something which will give them an impetus to continue living or at least something which will give meaning and direction to their lives. As Beckett himself says clearly, those who search for meaning , will find it no quicker than those who sit and wait . The meaning about life that these tramps hope is never stated precisely.

The audience leave the theatre with the knowledge that these tramps are strangely tied to one another. Even through they quarrel and fight, and even though they have exhausted all conversation,  they are bound to each other. The second act is repetitive and almost identical -the loneliness and weakness in each calls out to the other,and they are held by a mystical bond of interdependence.  The other two characters ,Pozzo and Lucky,  are on a journey without any apparent goal and are symbolically tied together.  One talks, the other say nothing.  The waiting of Vladimir and Estragon and the journeying of Pozzo and Lucky offer themselves as contracts to various activities in the modern world - all of which lead to no fruitful end.  Therefore each pair is hopelessly alienated from the other.

To sum up,Waiting for Godot presents a critique of modern society by showing the totall collapse of communication, of man's being forced to conform to a word of mediocrity where no action is meaningful. 


Post a Comment

Back To Top